Friday, November 20, 2009

Alcatraz Is Not An Island


In 1969 a group of Native American students and urban Indians began the occupation of Alcatraz island in the San Francisco bay. Eventually joined by thousands of Native Americans, they reclaimed "Indian Land" for the first time since the 1880's, forever changing the way Native Americans viewed themselves, their culture and their sovereign rights. This occupation paved the way for a number of changes in U.S. policy with regards to Native Americans.

The takeover of Alcatraz was one of the most successful American Indian protest actions of the 20th century, fueling the rise of modern Native American activism. In fact, many of the 74 Indian occupations of federal facilities that followed Alcatraz were either planned by or included people who had been involved in seizing the island. The occupation also brought Indian rights issues to the attention of the federal government and American public, changing forever the way Native people viewed themselves, their culture and their inherent right to self-determination.

The occupation also succeeded in getting the federal government to end its policy of termination and adopt an official policy of Indian self-determination. From 1970 to 1971, Congress passed 52 legislative proposals on behalf of American Indians to support tribal self-rule. President Nixon increased the BIA budget by 225 percent, doubled funds for Indian health care and established the Office of Indian Water Rights. Also during Nixon's presidency, scholarship funds were increased by $848,000 for college students. The Office of Equal Opportunity provided more funds for economic development and drug and alcohol recovery programs and expanded housing, health care and other programs.

After visiting the occupiers on Alcatraz Island, the American Indian Movement (AIM) began a series of national protest actions by seizing federal facilities. Comprised of mostly younger, more progressive and better educated urban Indians, AIM was initially formed to protect urban Indians from civil rights abuses. Inspired by the Alcatraz occupation, AIM became an important multi-tribal protest organization during the '70s. Its first protest action was on Thanksgiving Day 1970, when AIM members painted Plymouth Rock red and seized the Mayflower II replica in Plymouth, Massachusetts to challenge a celebration of colonial expansion.

From the takeover of Alcatraz Island in 1969 to the Longest Walk in 1978, the Alcatraz-Red Power Movement (ARPM) used social protest to demand that the government honor treaty obligations by providing resources, education, housing and healthcare to alleviate poverty. The ARPM aimed to build Indian colleges and create Indian studies programs, museums and cultural centers with federal funds to redress centuries of cultural repression.

Although Native Americans had participated in social movements throughout the 20th century, the ARPM differed from past movements in that they demanded inclusion in U.S. institutions while retaining their cultural identity. As Indian activism progressed, the Red Power movement became more serious and sometimes violent. In November 1972, several Native rights organizations staged the Trail of Broken Treaties caravan on the eve of the 1972 presidential election with the intention of presenting President Nixon with a 20-point program redefining U.S.-Indian relations. Angered by the lack of logistical support promised by Interior Department officials, Native American activists took over BIA headquarters in Washington, D.C., taking vast numbers of confidential files concerning the BIA and Indian Health Service (IHS) and inflicting $2.2 million in damage to the building. Embarrassed by the media coverage, the Nixon Administration promised to respond to their demands within a month and gave them $66,000 in transportation money immediately in exchange for a peaceful end to the occupation.

After 1972, the expanding protests of urban Indian groups spread to the reservations and revealed increasing tensions within Indian communities, often characterized as "traditional" versus "assimilated" Indians. These conflicts came to a head at "Wounded Knee II," a ten-week siege on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. The conflict at Wounded Knee involved the impeachment of Oglala Lakota (Sioux)'s tribal chairman, Richard Wilson, who was considered corrupt by many elders and traditional members of the tribe, including those associated with AIM. Other tribe members, many of whom were family members and friends who had received the few jobs and resources the tribal government had to offer, supported Wilson. The two opposing factions armed themselves and a standoff ensued, involving tribal police, AIM, people living on the reservation, federal law enforcement officials, the BIA, celebrities, philanthropic, religious and legal organizations, the U.S. military and the news media. The siege ended May 9 after negotiations between President Nixon's representative Leonard Garment and AIM leaders Dennis Banks and Carter Camp. During the standoff, two Native Americans and one FBI agent were killed. Wilson remained in office. In the next few years, numerous occupations occurred on reservations involving tribal factions associated with AIM or urban tribal members.

The last major event of the Alcatraz-Red Power Movement was The Longest Walk from February to July 1978. Several hundred Native Americans marched from San Francisco to Washington, D.C. to symbolize the forced removal of American Indians from their homelands and to draw attention to the continuing problems plaguing the Indian community. The march also attempted to call attention to backlash against Indian treaty rights that was gaining momentum in Congress. Unlike many protest events of the mid-'70s, the walk was a peaceful event.

The Alcatraz-Red Power Movement declined in the late '70s, due in large part to the FBI's suppression and infiltration through its then secret operation COINTELPRO, which sought to "neutralize" any activist organization with strong dissenting views against the federal government. Within three years of the Wounded Knee II siege, 69 members and supporters of AIM died violently on the reservation. Nearly 350 others were physically assaulted. None of their killers were convicted, and many of the cases were never investigated. Many AIM leaders were imprisoned. Divisions within AIM revealed a split in the movement between those who fought for the rights of the urban Indian community and others who favored a national activist agenda. After 1978, the tactic of property seizures fell out of favor, signaling the end of Red Power activism.

But the Red Power movement accomplished many of its goals. By the early 1980s, over 100 Indian studies programs had been created in the United States. Tribal museums opened, and the United Nations recognized an international indigenous rights movement. AIM continued fighting for Indian rights in land and grazing rights battles; protesting athletic team Indian mascots; and working for the repatriation of sacred objects taken from Indian land.

Every November since 1975, Indian people have gathered on Alcatraz Island on what is called "Un-Thanksgiving Day" to honor the occupation and those who continue to fight for Native American rights today.


For thousands of Native Americans, the infamous Alcatraz is not an island...it is an inspiration. In 1969, after generations of oppression, assimilation and near genocide, a group of Indian activists fought for justice and self-determination.


See Alcatraz Is Not An Island (PBS Documentary)

40th Alcatraz Occupation Anniversary Events!


Friday, November 20, 11 am - 3 pm, A new Native American Mural Dedication and Unveiling, Cesar Chavez Student Center ~ West Plaza, SFSU, 1650 Holloway Ave. The Mural depicts community activism, self determination, resistance and survivance of Native American peoples. 1:00 pm - City of SF Proclamation presented by Andrew Jolivette to Annie Oakes and Fawn Oakes

Friday, November 20th, Free of charge. 40th Anniversary of the Occupation of Alcatraz Program hosted by Richie Richards, Native American Education Specialist for the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology at UC Berkeley Hearst Museum patio, 103 Kroeber Hall, Berkeley.

The event will honor and commemorate the original efforts and intentions of the student-based occupation that took place in 1969; which was to protest the social conditions Native Americans were being subjected to in both urban areas and on reservations.

Please RSVP by sending contact information to Richie Richards at naes-pahma [at] berkeley.edu.

*Healthy lunch will be provided to occupation speakers and elders who attend.. Lunch will be provided by Friendly Natives Catering: bluemaiz [at] yahoo.com

Saturday, November 21st, 8 am. 40th Anniversary Celebration of the Takeover of Alcatraz by Indians of All Tribes. Meeting at Pier 33 at 8 am. Tell the ticketing office you're with the 'Occupation ceremony'.

We're holding a commemoration on the island and trying to locate as many people as possible that inhabited or even just visited the island during the occupation from Nov. 1969 to June of 1971. This was a monumental event in Indian Country with international attention drawn to the plight of the American Indian. It helped shape reforms in policy that impact Native Americans to this day. Come join us!

Saturday, November 21st- Film Screening of Alcatraz is Not an Island. Artist Television Access,992 Valencia Street (at 21st) San Francisco (415)824-3890
Filmmaker James Fortier will be in attendance as well as members of the Oaks family.

Wednesday, November 25th from 6pm till sunrise- KPOO 89.5 FM live broadcast interview with film makers and film projection on Coit ower.
The themes are honoring the occupation and also raising the presence of Ohlone leaders.

Thursday, November 26th, $14 Indigenous People's Annual Thanksgiving Sunrise Gathering on Alcatraz. Boats depart 4:45-6:00am Pier 33, San Francisco.
Purchase advance tickets at http://www.alcatrazcruises.com (http://www.alcatrazcruises.com/website/sunrise-gathering.aspx) or call (415) 981 7625. For more information contact Morning Star Gali at morningstar [at] treatycouncil.org (415) 641 4482. Sponsored by International Indian Treaty Council and American Indian Contemporary arts. http://www.treatycouncil.org

Please check out this incredible archive of news coverage and footage from the 1969 occupation from the SF State archive project:
http://diva.sfsu.edu/collections/sfbatv/2589


Morning Star Gali
Community Liaison Coordinator
International Indian Treaty Council
morningstar [at] treatycouncil.org
Tel. + 415.641.4482
Fax + 415.641.1298


News from Indianz.Com

20 Nov 2009: Today's Democracy Now!

As UC Regents Approve Major Tuition Hike, Students, Faculty Decry Erosion of Public Education in CA and Nationwide
Amid thousands of student protesters and armed police standing guard, the University of California’s Board of Regents has approved a 32 percent increase in student fees. The vote will bring the total cost of a UC education to more than $10,000 per year for the first time. We discuss the protests and the growing privatization of public education with UCLA student activist Zen Dochterman and the president of the UC American Federation of Teachers, Bob Samuels.

On 20th Anniversary of Killings of 6 Jesuit Priests by US-Backed Salvadoran Forces, Thousands to Protest "School of the Assassins" at Ft. Benning
Thousands are gathering at Fort Benning in Georgia this weekend for the annual protest to shut down the US Army training center dubbed by critics as the “School of the Assassins” for having trained some of the worst human rights violators in Latin America. This year’s protest will mark the twentieth anniversary of the murder of six Jesuit priests in El Salvador by the US-backed Salvadoran military. It comes days after the priests were posthumously bestowed El Salvador’s highest civilian award, marking the first time the Salvadoran government has honored the priests since their deaths. To talk about the priests and the overall state of Latin American affairs, we’re joined by Blase Bonpane, director of the Office of the Americas. A former Maryknoll priest, he has worked for more than four decades to promote human rights in Latin America.

Israel Under Widespread International Criticism for Settlement Expansion Plan
Israel is coming under widespread international criticism for its plan to engage in a new round of illegal settlement expansion on occupied Palestinian land. Israel says it will build 900 new housing units in the East Jerusalem settlement of Gilo. Meanwhile, Palestinian Authority leaders began a renewed effort last week to win international support for formal Security Council endorsement of a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders. We speak with UCLA professor Saree Makdisi, author of Palestine Inside Out: An Everyday Occupation.

Headlines

Mortgage Delinquencies Hit Record High
Siding with Katrina Victims, Ruling Faults Army Corps for New Orleans Flooding
US: Security Council Should Define Aggression for ICC
8 Killed in Suspected US Drone Attack in Pakistan
16 Killed in Afghan Bombing
White House: No Afghan Troop Decision Before Thanksgiving Holiday
Vietnam Vet Holds Antiwar Fast Outside White House
UN: Afghanistan World’s Most Dangerous Nation for Children
US Ratification Urged on 20th Anniversary of Children’s Rights Convention
Ban Calls for $30B in Climate Aid to Poor Nations
Geithner Rejects Calls for Resignation Before Congressional Panel
Study: Uninsured 80% More Likely to Die From Traumatic Injuries
Thousands to Protest US Military Training School at Ft. Benning


“Torture Memos” Report to be Released This Month

AG Holder Says “Torture Memos” Report to be Released This Month

After thousands signed petitions from Alliance for Justice and CREDO Action, and many made personal calls to the Justice Department, Attorney General Eric Holder said today that the report on the “torture memos” will be released by the end of this month.

“I think this is a matter of great public interest, the whole question of the OPR report,” Holder said. “The report is completed. It is being reviewed now and it is in its last stages, there is a career prosecutor who has to review the report. We expect that that process should be done by the end of the month and at that point the report should be issued.” Read more on the Justice Watch blog.


Lynne Stewart: Heroic Human Rights Lawyer Jailed


Lynne Stewart: Heroic Human Rights Lawyer Jailed - by Stephen Lendman

On November 20, New York Times writer Colin Moynihan broke the news headlining:

"Radical Lawyer Convicted of Aiding Terrorist Is Jailed," then saying:

"Defiant to the end as she embraced supporters outside the federal courthouse in Lower Manhattan, Lynne F. Stewart, the radical lawyer known for defending unpopular clients, surrendered on Thursday to begin serving her 28-month sentence for assisting terrorism."

Fact check:

Stewart did what all attorneys should, but few, in fact, do - observe the American Bar Association's Model Rules saying all lawyers are obligated to:

"devote professional time and resources and use civic influence to ensure equal access to our system of justice for all those who because of economic or social barriers cannot afford or secure adequate legal counsel."

Also to practice law ethically, morally and responsibly to assure everyone is afforded due process and judicial fairness in American courts. Sadly and disturbingly, Stewart was denied what she did for others heroically, unselfishly, and proudly. More on that below.

Stewart (prison number 53504-054) is now jailed at:
MCC-NY
150 Park Row
New York, NY 10007

Betrayed by American Justice

For 30 years, Stewart worked heroically to defend America's poor, underprivileged, and unwanted, never afforded due process and judicial fairness without an advocate like her. Where others wouldn't go, she defended controversial figures like David Gilbert of the Weather Underground, Richard Williams of the United Freedom Front, Sekou Odinga and Nasser Ahmed of the Black Liberation Army, and many more like them. She knew the risk, but did it fearlessly and courageously until bogusly indicted on April 9, 2002 for:

-- "conspiring to defraud the United States;

-- conspiring to provide and conceal material support to terrorist activity;

-- providing and concealing material support to terrorist activity; and

-- two counts of making false statements."

She was also accused of violating US Bureau of Prisons Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) that included a gag order on her client, Sheik Abdel Rahman. When imposed, they prohibit discussion on topics the Justice Department (DOJ) rules outside of "legal representation," so lawyers can't discuss them with clients, thus inhibiting their defense.

At former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark's request, she joined him as part of Rahman's court-appointed defense team. In his 1995 show trial, he was convicted and is now serving a life sentence for seditious conspiracy, solicitation of murder, solicitation of an attack on American military installations, conspiracy to murder, and conspiracy to bomb in connection with the 1993 World Trade Center attack despite evidence proving his innocence on all charges.

The DOJ's case wasn't about alleged crimes. It reflected his affiliations and anti-western views. Rahman was connected to the Egyptian-based Al-Gamaa al-Islamiyya - a 1997 US State Department-designated "foreign terrorist organization." In the 1980s, however, he helped the CIA recruit Mujahadeen fighters against the Soviets in Afghanistan. For his work, he got a US visa, green card, and State Department-CIA protection as long as he was valued. When no longer, he was targeted along with Stewart.

Her case was precedent-setting, chilling, and according to the Center of Constitutional Rights Michael Ratner:

sent "a message to lawyers who represent alleged terrorists that it's dangerous to do so."

Her attorney, Michael Tigar, called it:

"an attack on a gallant, charismatic and effective fighter for justice (with) at least three fundamental faults:

-- (it) attack(ed) the First Amendment right of free speech, free press and petition;

-- the right to effective assistance of counsel (by) chill(ing) the defense; (and)

-- the 'evidence' in this case was gathered by wholesale invasion of private conversations, private-attorney-client meetings, faxes, letters and e-mails; I have never seen such an abuse of government power."

Her 2004 - 2005 show trial was a mockery of justice with echoes of the worst McCarthy-like tactics. Inflammatory terrorist images were displayed in court to prejudice the jury, and prosecutors vilified Stewart as a traitor with "radical" political views. In addition, days before the verdict, the militant pro-Israeli Jewish Defense Organization put up flyers near the courthouse displaying her address. It threatened to "drive her out of her home and out of the state," and said she "needs to be put out of business legally and effectively."

It was part of the orchestrated scheme inside and outside the courtroom to heighten fear, convict Stewart, and intimidate other lawyers to expect the same treatment if they dare represent unpopular clients effectively.

On February 10, 2005 (after a seven month trial and 13 days of deliberation) she was convicted on all five counts. Under New York state law, she was automatically disbarred, and the state Supreme Court's Appellate Division denied her petition to resign voluntarily. On October 17, 2006, she was sentenced to 28 months imprisonment, but remained free on bond pending appeal before the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Stewart Ordered to Prison

The Justice for Lynne Stewart web site (lynnestewart.org) announced the news. On November 17, the Appeals Court revoked her bond, upheld the verdict, ordered her surrender forthwith, but stayed it until November 19 at 5PM to let her attorney file a motion for reconsideration. It was denied, so she must report to federal marshals as directed. A November 19 conversation with Lynne and her husband Ralph confirmed it.

The situation remains fluid, dire, and complicated by Stewart's battle with breast cancer. She has surgery scheduled for December 7, unlikely now, but if done in prison or where authorities direct, it won't be the quality she deserves.

In its ruling, the three judge panel (John Walker, Guido Calebresi and Robert Sack) was firm, hostile and belligerent in upholding the lower court's conviction. Judge Sack accused Stewart of lying and called for a longer sentence. "We think that whether (she) lied under oath at her trial is directly relevant to whether her sentence was appropriate," he wrote, and directed District Court Judge John Koeltl to re-sentence her "so as to reflect that finding." Judge Walker was even harsher, calling the original sentence "breathtakingly low." Judge Calabrese said: "I am at a loss for any rationale upon this record that could reasonably justify a sentence of 28 months' imprisonment for this defendant."

They all said Stewart was "convicted principally with respect to (her violating) measures by which (she) had agreed to abide," namely SAMs. They rejected her "argument that, as a lawyer, she was not bound by (them), and her belated argument collaterally attacking their constitutionality." They also:

"affirm(ed her conviction) of providing and concealing material support to the conspiracy to murder persons in a foreign country (and) of conspiring to provide and conceal such support....We conclude that the charges were valid (and) the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions. We also reject Stewart's claims that her purported attempt to serve as a 'zealous advocate' for her client provides her with immunity from the convictions...."

"Finally, we affirm Stewart's convictions for knowingly and willfully making false statements....when she affirmed that she intended to, and would, abide by the SAMs. In light of her repeated and flagrant violation of (them), a reasonable factfinder could conclude that (her) representations that she intended to and would abide by the SAMs were knowingly false when made. We reject the remaining challenges to the convictions. (We) affirm the district court's rejection of Stewart's claim that she was selectively prosecuted on account of her gender or political beliefs....We therefore affirm the convictions in their entirety."

They redirected her case to District Court Judge Koeltl for re-sentencing. The DOJ wants 30 years. Koeltl originally imposed 28 months, let Stewart remain free on bond pending appeal, implied his decision might be overturned because of a gross miscarriage of justice, effectively rebuked the Bush administration at the time, and handed it a major defeat. Her fate is now in his hands, but justice has already been denied at a time we're all as vulnerable as she if we dare resist state policies, unchanged under an administration no different from its predecessor.

In a November 17 news conference, Stewart said:

"I'm too old to cry, but it hurts too much not to." In criticizing the Court's decision, she said its timing "on the eve of the arrival of the tortured men from offshore prison in Guantanamo" suggests that lawyers appointed to represent them may face the same fate as she. "If you're going to lawyer for these people, you'd better toe very close to the line that the government has set out (because they'll) be watching you every inch of the way, (so those who don't) will end up like Lynne Stewart. This is a case that is bigger than just me personally (but she added that she'll) go on fighting."

So will her lawyer, Joshua Dratel, who said he'll pursue it "as far and as long as we can," including a possible Supreme Court review. The Obama US attorney's office was silent, effectively affirming a gross injustice at a time the due process and judicial fairness thresholds are so low that all Americans risk the same fate as Lynne.

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Monday - Friday at 10AM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on world and national issues. All programs are archived for easy listening.


http://republicbroadcasting.org/Global%20Research/index.php?cmd=archives.year&ProgramID=33&year=9

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Noble Red Man CD Now Available


§«,¸¸,.•´¯`•.,¸¸,.»§«,¸¸,.•´¯`•.,¸¸,.»§«,¸¸,.•´¯`•.,¸¸,.»§


Brand new CD:

NOBLE RED MAN

The Transformative Words of
Lakota Wisdomkeeper Mathew King


A one-of-a-kind spoken-word performance by Harvey Arden with haunting music by Jeff Foreman

"Amazing CD--will rend your heart and transform your mind."

*

When we want wisdom we go up on the hill
And we talk to God, Wakan Tanka.
Four days and four nights.
No food. No water.

~

Yes, you can—
You can talk to God up on a hill
all by yourself.
You can say anything you want.
Nobody’s there to listen to you.
Just you and God and nobody else

~

It’s a great feeling to be talking to God.
I know.
I did it way up on the mountain.
The wind was blowing.
It was dark.
It was cold.
And I stood there
And I talked to God.


—Mathew King, Chief NOBLE RED MAN

*

Now available at

www.haveyouthought.com


News from Indianz.Com


Senate Indian Affairs action on IHCIA postponed (11/19)

Senate Indian Affairs hearing on drugs and gangs (11/19)

Native Sun: Indian gaming and tribal sovereignty (11/19)

Max Baucus: A promising future in Indian Country (11/19)

BIA goes after drunk driving on reservation roads (11/19)

DOI disbursed $765M to Indian trust beneficiaries (11/19)

Employment: Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe doctor (11/19)

Employment: Creek Nation's request for proposal (11/19)

Employment: Head Start fiscal content specialist (11/19)

Navajo woman killed in accident at Southern Ute (11/19)

Suspect in custody as First Nation mourns death (11/19)

Cherokee Nation to contribute $54K to politicians (11/19)

Group fights sacred site protection in New Mexico (11/19)

Arizona tribes welcome business to reservations (11/19)

Standing Rock chairman not pushing 'Sioux' vote (11/19)

Standing Rock chairman not pushing 'Sioux' vote (11/19)

Column: Readers offer more names for 'Redskins' (11/19)

Mashantucket Tribe close to gaming debt default (11/19)

Editorial: Gambing hurts social fabric of Oklahoma (11/19)

Louisiana casinos report another drop in revenues (11/19)

More headlines...

Activist who refused grand jury testimony now charged with conspiracy


Activist who refused grand jury testimony now charged with conspiracy
Ann McGlynn Posted: Thursday, November 19, 2009 10:20 am
http://www.qctimes.com/news/local/article_f77ee8a0-d527-11de-81f3-001cc4c002e0.html

A Minnesota activist who refused to testify earlier this week before a federal grand jury in Davenport is now charged with conspiracy for an act of “animal enterprise terrorism” ­ believed to be a 2004 animal-rights vandalism act at the University of Iowa.

Scott DeMuth, 22, made his initial appearance this morning on a charge of conspiracy. DeMuth was already in custody for contempt of court because of his refusal to testify. Fellow activist Carrie Feldman, who at one time dated DeMuth, also refused to testify and is in custody.

“Scott Ryan DeMuth did knowingly and intentionally conspire with persons unknown to the grand jury to commit animal enterprise terrorism and cause economic damage to the animal enterprise in an amount exceeding $10,000,” the indictment unsealed today says.

The indictment does not specifically say the charge is in connection to the University of Iowa action. However, the time frame and indication that it was in Johnson County match. Furthermore, federal authorities considered the extensive vandalism an act of terrorism. And DeMuth and Feldman both have said the Nov. 14 vandalism is what federal authorities wanted them to testify about.

DeMuth is being held in the Muscatine County Jail. Feldman is in the Washington County Jail.

The FBI was called in to investigate the November 2004 vandalism and break-in at the University of Iowa's Spence Laboratories and Seashore Hall.

The Animal Liberation Front, an underground animal-rights activist group, claimed responsibility for the damage to lab equipment and the release of 88 mice and 313 rats used in psychology department experiments. The break-in was designated as domestic terrorism.

UI officials estimated the damage in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and offered a $10,000 reward for tips leading to identification of the vandals. The university also increased security at its labs after the break-in.

A 50-minute video released to the media by ALF after the break-in showed at least four masked people had access to electronic keys and took their time as they ransacked the laboratories.

David Skorton, then president of the university, condemned the destruction and the implied threat to researchers in an e-mail, which listed researcher names, home addresses and phone numbers. The e-mail was posted on a Web site that posts reports of ALF activity.

The environment for researchers at the university, Skorton said, was "permanently altered."

ALF, according to its Web site, is "a loosely associated collection of cells of people who intentionally violate the law in order to free animals from captivity and the horrors of exploitation." The people in one cell do not know people in other cells to "prevent legal authorities from breaking up the organization."

They break into buildings to release animals, destroy property and use intimidation to "prevent further animal abuse and murder," the site says.

Feldman, 20, and DeMuth, both from Minneapolis, were ordered held Tuesday until they decide to testify before the grand jury, Judge John Jarvey ruled. Their confinement could be for the term of the grand jury ­ which they believe has 11 months remaining ­ or until the end of this proceeding, federal code says. The longest they can be held is 18 months.

It is unclear whether DeMuth’s civil contempt still stands.

About 40 people from across the Midwest traveled to support Feldman and DeMuth, who spoke at a rally outside the courthouse in downtown Davenport before their appearance. The protesters were met by a heavy police presence.


Washington Protest Demands “Justice for Mumia”


Article w/photos at http://www.phillyimc.org/en/washington-dc-protest-demands-%E2%80%9Cjustice-mumia%E2%80%9D

Washington Protest Demands “Justice for Mumia”
Written Article by Betsey Piette
Photos by Joe Piette

Over 25,000 letters calling on U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to conduct a civil rights investigation of the 28 year conspiracy to execute death row political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal were delivered to the doors of the Department of Justice in Washington at the end of a spirited march and rally on Nov. 12.

The letter campaign took on world-wide momentum earlier this year after Holder called for the dismissal of charges against Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska on the basis that prosecutors in that case withheld evidence favorable to the defense.

The letters to Holder on Mumia’s behalf make it clear that in addition to a similar pattern of evidence being withheld in his case, courts on local, state and federal levels have all violated their own rules to keep Abu-Jamal on death row. The letters make a point that rules that apply for a powerful, wealthy U.S. senator like Stevens should apply as well to an African-American political activist.

Despite a December 2001 ruling by Federal District Court Judge William Yohn that converted the death sentence in Abu-Jamal’s case to life in prison, he remains on death row and his life in jeopardy because of efforts by the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office to appeal Yohn’s decision. Abu-Jamal has exhausted other federal appeals seeking a new trial in his case.

Meanwhile Seth Williams, who was elected earlier in November as the first African-American to hold the position of Philadelphia District Attorney, campaigned on the basis of support for reinstating the death sentence in Abu-Jamal’s case.

EVIDENCE WITHHELD

Dr. Suzanne Ross from the Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition, who chaired the press conference and indoor rally at the New York Avenue Presbyterian Church, told how for 13 years the prosecution withheld evidence that a driver’s license belonging to a passenger in the car driven by Mumia’s brother William Cook was found in the pocket of slain police officer Daniel Faulkner.

Attorney Thomas Ruffin who outlined the legal issues in Abu-Jamal’s case told of photos taken by independent photographer Pedro Polakoff who arrived at the scene of the Dec. 9, 1981 shooting before the police forensics team. These pictures exposed the lies told by key prosecution witnesses during the trial. The prosecution, who had access to these pictures, never shared information of their existence with the defense.

Ruffin noted that there was no proof that Abu-Jamal had his gun in hand when he arrived on the scene or that he had fired it. The prosecution never presented paraffin tests for gunshot residue. The prosecution claimed that this standard test administered to a defendant’s hands in cases when a gun was the murder weapon, had not been performed in Abu-Jamal’s case.

SOLIDARITY WITH MUSLIM POLITICAL PRISONERS

One of the significant aspects of the press conference and protest was the open solidarity with victims of the state’s COINTELPRO like campaign that has targeted over 400 Muslims and recently resulted in FBI agents gunning down and murdering Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah in Detroit on Oct. 31.

Several family members and supporters of the Fort Dix Five from N.J. attended the events. Leila Duka, the eleven year old daughter and niece of three of these Muslim political prisoners, spoke at the press conference. Two members of another Muslim prisoner, Shifa , came from Atlanta to take part, and organizers with Project Salam, an organization that works to draw attention to these and others cases, attended from Albany.

In an important act of solidarity plans for a separate protest at the Justice Dept. on Nov.21 to demand that Holder investigate the growing human rights violation of Muslims in the U.S.were changed in order to join forces on Nov 12. At the press conference several speakers made reference to the dangerous campaign growing against Muslims.

INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY

The array of support for Mumia Abu-Jamal was impressive. Fignole Saint-Cyr, President of the Autonomous Unions of Haiti delivered 986 signed letters collected on Abu-Jamal’s behalf and flew into Washington to attend a press conference earlier in the day. Saint-Cyr stated “Right now the world should observe American justice because the U.S. is supposed to stand for democracy. Justice should not be two-faced. Justice for Black people and for white people should be equal.”

Thousands of signed letters were also gathered in Germany where the city council in Munich passed a resolution demanding justice and a new trial for Mumia and the abolition of the death penalty in the U.S.

Letters were sent from S. African labor and political groups who had engaged in their own fight to overturn the racist apartheid system and recognized Abu-Jamal as a victim of racist injustice in the U.S. Other letters came from Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Spain, and throughout Latin America.

From the U.S. there were letters and resolutions from unions, churches, and national organizations including the NAACP and the National Lawyers Guild, as well as progressive politicians like Cynthia McKinney and Charles Rangel. Representatives of the NAACP, Amnesty International, the Campaign to End the Death Penalty, International Action Center, National Congress of Puerto Rican Rights, and the Riverside Church Prison Ministry spoke at the press conference.

In closing the indoor event Pam Africa, with the MOVE organization and International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal, stated “Mumia was railroaded and the evidence is there. Mumia is not on trial here –the movement is. It’s up to us to stand up for what’s right.”